Read the gacaca courts, post genocide justice and reconciliation in rwanda justice without lawyers by phil clark available from rakuten kobo. An analysis of the effectiveness of the gacaca court system in post. May 31, 2011 category 1 cases remained within the jurisdiction of the conventional courts. Anuradha chakravarty, investing in authoritarian rule, punishment and patronage in rwandas gacaca courts for genocide crimes new york. The gacaca court is a system of community justice inspired by rwandan tradition where. Keywords genocide, restorative justice, rwanda, punishment, courts. Questions about the gacaca courts in rwanda opinio juris. The gacaca courts in rwanda background 120,000 accused genocidaires distinguished between genocide. Some rwandans say that it has helped set in motion reconciliation within. The gacaca courts in rwanda, new york university journal of. The relevance of justice after genocide speaks to the appropriateness of retributive and restorative models of justice in a. Perceptions of xhosa, afrikaner, and english south africans, journal of black studies, 34.
View test prep rwanda postgenocide from jups 204 at georgetown university. The former can bring justice, the latter can seek the truth. The first phase, which began in 1997 and is still continuing, targets the most serious offenders. Post genocide reconciliation this paper has a twofold objective. Only 118 such courts had previously conducted trials, a kind of pilot program for the gacaca system. Jun 02, 2017 rwandas gacaca courts are hailed as a postgenocide success.
Rwandas gacaca courts are hailed as a postgenocide. The epicentre of post genocide rwandan society and politics has been the need for reconciliation to assuage ethnic tensions and end a culture of impunity. The gacaca system and the international criminal tribunal for. Often lauded by international observers, rwandas gacaca courts have long been held up by their proponents as a model for successful, postconflict reconciliation efforts. The location, identification and respectful burial of the anonymous victims of mass atrocities. An analysis of the effectiveness of the gacaca court. In the context of transitional justice, retributive justice, which seeks justice and focuses on the perpetrators, appears to.
Lessons from postgenocide rwanda justice and reconciliation. After two years of pretrial activity, nearly all of the 1,545 gacaca courts in rwanda formally began trials on saturday. Gacaca courts the ictr is set up by the united nations and only indicts a small number of people, the organisers of the genocide. Gacaca gambling with justice amnesty international uk. Their views, varied as they are, have important implications for the success of justice, whether in gacaca courts, domestic trials or international. Over three years later, and with gacaca proceedings coming to an end on 18 june 2012, we sought to uncover whether this sentiment had changed. The norwegian helsinki committee has since early 1990s promoted accountability for crimes against humanity and war. Global tides volume 8 article 4 112014 an analysis of the effectiveness of the gacaca court system in postgenocide rwanda lauren haberstock pepperdine university, lauren. The epicentre of postgenocide rwandan society and politics has been the need for reconciliation to assuage ethnic tensions and end a culture of impunity. Nearly every adult rwandan has participated in the trials, principally by providing eyewitness testimony concerning genocide crimes.
The gacaca courts are a method of transitional justice and are designed to. The focus will be on the gacaca courts since these courts represented a restorative and retributive justice approach which was hoped to address the basic human needs of victims and perpetrators. The introduction of the gacaca courts improved the performance of the formal justice system and facilitated postconflict recovery. After the genocide, the new rwandan patriotic fronts government struggled to. The gacaca courts are not just a way to deliver justice to the huge number of awaitingtrial prisoners, but are envisioned as a key restorative mechanism, a means to contribute to the national process of social reconstruction. The legacy of rwandas communitybased gacaca courts hrw. If gacaca fails to end the perceptions of impunity in post genocide rwanda, it will come at a much higher cost for reconciliation than the failure of the ictr. Brittany fried sfs19 describes rwandas gacaca justice system and the way her visit to the mageragere tig camp where perpetrators of violence and genocide perform community service prompted her to consider the delicate balance between justice and reconciliation. Although loosely based on a traditional dispute resolution process, 1 the current gacaca is a statutory creation. Justice after genocide20 years on human rights watch.
The perpetrators and victims of the genocide continue to live together and therefore have to engage in a reconciliation process in order to avoid. The need for transitional justice and reconciliation in rwanda becomes. The gacaca model is touted by the government of rwanda, its allies and some scholars as a largely successful model of providing justice and building reconciliation. Read the gacaca courts, postgenocide justice and reconciliation in rwanda justice without lawyers by phil clark available from rakuten kobo. Truth, reconciliation, and revenge in rwanda, genocide studies and prevention 3 2008. University student perspectives on the gacaca courts in postgenocide rwanda jacqueline lewis edited by kaitlin lounsbury genocide is likely to occur again. The gacaca courts in the aftermath of the rwandan genocide the crippled formal judicial system failed to administer justice in a timely manner. Chakravartys work is an indispensable read for anyone interested in transitional justice. Jul 15, 2012 the focus will be on the gacaca courts since these courts represented a restorative and retributive justice approach which was hoped to address the basic human needs of victims and perpetrators.
Locating the short circuit in rwanda s gacaca courts. The gacaca courts, postgenocide justice and reconciliation in rwanda since 2001, the gacaca community courts have been the centrepiece of rwandas justice and reconciliation programme. A modified version of the traditional gacaca courts were introduced to hear cases from the backlog of over 100,000 genocide suspects. If gacaca fails to end the perceptions of impunity in postgenocide rwanda, it will come at a much higher cost for reconciliation than the failure of the ictr. The establishment of gacaca courts in 2001 is one of the key landmarks of postgenocide rwanda. Watch documentary videos related to the 1994 genocide against the tutsi in rwanda that were donated by international and local news agencies.
Traditional dispute resolution in postgenocide rwanda july 19, 2016. Rwanda to promote reconciliation after the 1994 genocide. The international criminal tribunal for rwanda ictr 2. In the aftermath of the rwandan genocide, the crippled formal judicial system failed to administer justice in a timely manner.
The gacaca courts, postgenocide justice and reconciliation. Truth, justice, and reconciliation in postconflict. Phil clark, the gacaca courts, post genocide justice and reconciliation in rwanda. Rwanda postgenocide retributive justice the gacaca. A missed opportunity for reconciliation in rwanda by albert gasake since the closure of gacaca courts in july 2012, enforcement of gacaca material compensation orders made to survivors remains one of the pressing challenges of the postgacaca period in. Stef vandeginste, justice, reconciliation and reparation after genocide and crimes. Oct 17, 2017 the answer lies in rwandas unique postgenocide justice and reconciliation process.
Drawing on six years of fieldwork in rwanda and nearly five hundred interviews with participants, this books conclusions provide indispensable insight into postgenocide justice and reconciliation. Since 2001, the gacaca community courts have been the centrepiece of rwandas justice and reconciliation programme. Mar 28, 2014 human rights watch has documented major legal reforms in rwanda in the last few years, but maintains the view, on the basis of its own trial observations and research in rwanda, that the rwandan. The gacaca courts in rwanda, new york university journal of international law and politics, vol. Apr 08, 2014 the gacaca model is touted by the government of rwanda, its allies and some scholars as a largely successful model of providing justice and building reconciliation. Gacaca courts were introduced in 1999 as a way of dealing with the hundreds of thousands of rwandans accused of involvement in the. Toran hansen delves eloquently into the gacaca tribunals in post genocide rwanda by first describing the history and background of the ethnic tensions that existed for decades between the hutu majority and the tutsi minority of the rwandan people. Justice without lawyers cambridge studies in law and society phil clark on. Journal of contemporary criminal justice genocide, justice. But its detractors, which include major human rights organizations, believe the system has serious shortcomings. The relevance of justice after genocide speaks to the appropriateness of retributive versus restorative modes of justice in a dualist post genocide society such as rwanda. The current tutsiled government hails these courts as a success claiming they have provided postconflict justice like never before.
Truth, justice and security in rwanda gacaca courts as a. In the aftermath of the rwandan genocide the crippled formal judicial system failed to administer justice in a timely manner. The gacaca courts, postgenocide justice and reconciliation in rwanda. This traditional, communal justice was adapted in 2001 to fit the needs of rwanda in the wake of the 1994 rwandan genocide where over an estimated 1,000,000 people were killed, tortured and raped. Drawing on six years of fieldwork in rwanda and nearly five hundred interviews with participants, this books conclusions provide indispensable insight into post genocide justice and reconciliation. Schabas abstract after many decades of impunity, rwanda has embarked upon a course of transitional justice committed to prosecuting all who are suspected of involvement in the 1994 genocide.
Lawyers are banned from any official involvement, an issue that has generated sustained criticism from human rights organisations and. Rwandans and the gacaca courts article pdf available in african journal of international and comparative law 181 may 2009 with 756 reads. The gacaca system and the international criminal tribunal. Gacaca courts date back to before rwanda was colonized bornkamm, 2012. The gacaca courts, postgenocide justice and reconciliation in rwanda since 2001, the gacaca community courts have been the centrepiece of rwanda s justice and reconciliation programme. Their experiences, perspectives and hopes was written to give voice to survivors perceptions of justice in the aftermath of the genocide in rwanda.
In the wake of 1994, rwanda could be considered hell on earth. With reference to reconciliation and peacemaking 10, the gacaca courts or tribunals in postgenocide rwanda are often presented as a successful transitional justice apparatus clark, 2010. Rwanda postgenocide retributive justice the gacaca courts. Does the truth pass across the fire without burning. At first the government of rwanda divided the perpetrators of the genocide according to their responsibility into four categories government of rwanda. Phil clark, the gacaca courts, postgenocide justice and. A modified version of the traditional gacaca courts was introduced to hear cases from the backlog of over 100,000 genocide suspects. Learning about it is the first step to understanding it. When we first interviewed the survivors in 2008, we observed a tendency towards scepticism about gacaca and its potential to achieve justice and reconciliation for themselves and for rwandans more broadly. Gacaca tribunals, a grassroots community dispute resolution system, had traditionally been used as a way for community elders to resolve village conflicts, but it was modified to address the serious nature of the genociderelated cases that have been clogging up the rwandan prisons and courts. An analysis of the effectiveness of the gacaca court system in post genocide rwanda lauren haberstock pepperdine university, lauren. Of this total, more than 100,000 suspects were believed to have died or to be living outside rwanda.
In the aftermath of the 1994 rwandan genocide in which an estimated 800,000 civilians most of whom were members of the nations minority tutsi population were killed, a number of initiatives have been pursued in an effort to locate and rebury with respect the anonymous victims. Vora and erika vora, the effectiveness of south africas truth and reconciliation commission. The essay opens with the discussion of the nature of the genocide and the responses to postgenocide rwandas crisis. Phil clark, the gacaca courts, postgenocide justice and reconciliation in rwanda. The gacaca courts, postgenocide justice and reconciliation in rwanda, justice without lawyers new york. Since 2001, the gacaca community courts have been the centrepiece of rwandas jsutice and reconciliation programme. The gacaca courts, postgenocide justice and reconciliation in. In the gacaca system, communities at the local level elected judges to hear the trials of genocide. The gacaca courts generated valuable information about the genocide suspects and increased access to the justice system. The country had a preconflict population of seven million.
Documentaries tv broadcasts gacaca process perpetrator confessions kwibuka conferences. This traditional, communal justice was adapted in 2001 to fit the needs of rwanda in the wake of the 1994 rwandan genocide where over an estimated. The goal of gacaca is to promote reconciliation by providing a platform for victims to express themselves, encouraging. Dec 04, 2014 phil clark, the gacaca courts, postgenocide justice and reconciliation in rwanda. Since 2001, the gacaca community courts have been the centrepiece of rwanda s justice and reconciliation programme. The relevance of justice after genocide speaks to the appropriateness of retributive versus restorative modes of justice in a dualist postgenocide society such as rwanda.
Carter introduction the gacaca proceedings in rwanda are an innovative and unique response to a postconflict situation. Rwandas gacaca courts are hailed as a postgenocide success. View test prep rwanda post genocide from jups 204 at georgetown university. Truth, justice and security in rwanda gacaca courts as a post. An analysis of the effectiveness of the gacaca court system. With reference to reconciliation and peacemaking 10, the gacaca courts or tribunals in post genocide rwanda are often presented as a successful transitional justice apparatus clark, 2010.
1444 253 678 496 405 277 775 1151 1291 461 1202 1217 1251 1471 1026 956 997 86 42 364 1393 820 385 950 186 733 855 925 1423 154 47 1475